PlanetCrap 6.0!
Front Page (ATOM) • Submission Bin (4) • ArchivesUsersLoginCreate Account
You are currently not logged in.
T O P I C
Cg: nVidious Plot or Graphical Revolution?
June 20th 2002, 01:55 CEST by m0nty

Slipping in amongst the news of Morrowind, NWN and WarCraft 3, nVidia and Microsoft have unveiled what they claim is the strongest push yet to bring cinematic-quality real-time graphics from the movie screen to the PC. The introduction in version 9 of Microsoft's DirectX of a High-Level Shading Language (HLSL), revealed earlier in 2002 and which has just gone into beta, have been trumped by nVidia, which has announced a high-level programming language called Cg - short for "C for graphics".

The common, familiar C-like syntax enables rapid development of stunning, real-time shaders and visual effects for graphics platforms, and is compatible with Microsoft's recently announced High Level Shading Language for DirectX® 9.0.

With Microsoft around, you know there will always be standards issues (remember OpenGL?), and this is no different. Cg represents nVidia's latest salvo in its battle with ATI and other graphics card vendors for the hearts and minds of developers over their preferred programmable shaders and 3D APIs. The vendors have already started attacking each others' DX9 support, and Cg brings a whole new set of arguments about cross-platform implementation and proprietary technologies. Let the new standards war begin!

If there is to be a war, nVidia surely have the metaphorical SoF2 briefcase camped beyond all hope of the terrorists escaping with it. In this interview with nVidia svengali David Kirk conducted by new Eurogamer offshoot Gamesindustry.biz, HLCL is even characterised as "Microsoft's own implementation of Cg", suggesting that nVidia is dictating terms to the dreaded Redmondians. Kirk fends off the inevitable question about incompatibility with non-nVidia hardware thusly:

"Our compiler generates shader code and sends it to DirectX or OpenGL, and shaders are a standard, so they should run on any card that supports the shader standards, including our competitors? Besides, I think it's in our interest to make sure that Cg runs well on everything - we want people to really use this technology, and that's all about taking away their reasons not to... Making the compiler so that it didn't work well on ATI cards, for example, would be really bad for us too."

Do you trust this man? Has nVidia created Cg out of the goodness of its heart, or is it really just another attack on its competitors? Does it matter, or should we just accept nVidia's dominance of the graphics card market? Will the majority of programmers choose Cg with all its supporting apps, or play it safe with the more limited HLCL? Will Cg become the new Glide - the troublesome rendering technology that was left behind when 3Dfx died? What does it mean for graphical engine makers, like id, Epic and Lithtech? What does this mean to games already in development: will they have to redo parts of their code? (Hi George B!)
C O M M E N T S
Home » Topic: Cg: nVidious Plot or Graphical Revolution?

|«« - Previous Page - Next Page - »»|
#93 by Hugin
2002-06-20 21:18:58
lmccain@nber.org
So, a buddy has read in the SF Chronicle (I can't find it anywhere else right now) that Circuit City is phasing out VHS movie sales.  They'll still sell VCRs and blank videotapes, but movie sales will be strictly DVD format.
#94 by Mister Nutty
2002-06-20 21:23:15
hooray for DVD!!!!!

Does anyone still buy pre-recorded VHS tapes? I'd guess the sales numbers aren't that great except for kid movies like Harry Potter and Disney stuff.  I have no facts to back it up but just a hunch that people who like movies enough that they'd buy them rather than rent them (with the kid exception mentioned since kids tend to watch the same dumb movies over and over because they are retarded), would own a DVD player and prefer to purchase the movie on DVD.

Smashing!
#95 by Hugin
2002-06-20 21:35:15
lmccain@nber.org
I pretty much stopped buying VHS about a year before I got my first DVD player, because I knew that it would be a waste of money and space, as I've been steadily converting everything on VHS I own to DVD.
#96 by Max Diablos
2002-06-20 21:35:26
Max conveniently declined to speak to either of my posts discussing his sweeping redefinition of genres twice in the original thread,


I can't even remember the posts you're refering to.

Geez MCorleone, even when he does respond, he doesn't respond.  He doesn't rebutt; he re words.


Why don't you ask yourself why I do that. I'm starting at the top and working down. If people are resistant, don't contribute, or can't explain why they think redefining "games" is wrong, don't expect me to peddle very hard.

What exactly are games, anyway?  Could someone give me a definition?


Many things. That's the problem. They're self-contained worlds running to a defined set of rules and objectives. They can be used for learning, entertainment, or reflection, like any other medium. The difference is they're interactive. Unfortunately the perception of games is that while they might have something to offer at an intellectual and creative level they rarely step beyond immediate gratification.

No helter skelter. No over the rainbow bad trip apocalypse. Just us and this moment now. This is how it ends.
#97 by jjohnsen
2002-06-20 21:46:33
http://www.johnsenclan.com
I pretty much stopped buying VHS about a year before I got my first DVD player, because I knew that it would be a waste of money and space, as I've been steadily converting everything on VHS I own to DVD.


I can't wait to see what the format will be in 2-3 years that I'll do the same thing with my dvd's.
#98 by Hugin
2002-06-20 21:49:02
lmccain@nber.org
Well, the big difference for me is, while something may replace DVD as the hot format, my DVD's aren't getting noticeably degraded every time I watch them, I can pause without damaging them, etc. It's a lot more stable in the medium-to-long-ish term than VHS, assuming a geeky level of re-watching.
#99 by Shadarr
2002-06-20 21:57:33
shadarr@yahoo.com http://digital-luddite.com
I bought two movies on VHS back in the day.  Never watched them.  Then I watched one of the movies I owned when it came on TV.  That's when I decided to get rid of the tapes.
#100 by Duality
2002-06-20 22:06:04
Dualipuff@yahoo.com http://stratoscape.ath.cx/
Since it seems destined to jump back to the redefinition of games ...

[q]They can be used for learning, entertainment, or reflection, like any other medium. The difference is they're interactive. Unfortunately the perception of games is that while they might have something to offer at an intellectual and creative level they rarely step beyond immediate gratification.[/q]
Why redefine the category of 'games' when this already is contained in the category of Interactive Multimedia?

-Jon
#101 by Duality
2002-06-20 22:06:37
Dualipuff@yahoo.com http://stratoscape.ath.cx/
And I'm, frankly; getting sick and tired of the quote tag being
not [q].

Fucking fucktags.

-Jon
#102 by Duality
2002-06-20 22:07:19
Dualipuff@yahoo.com http://stratoscape.ath.cx/
What was that sig of your's crash? .... just *weary*?

That sounds about right at this moment.

-Jon
#103 by crash
2002-06-20 22:17:12
yes, Duality. was:

just... weary.


Whoops, sorry, was my common sense showing again? -HoseWater
#104 by LPMiller
2002-06-20 22:23:27
lpmiller@gotapex.com http://www.gotapex.com
Max -

I did ask myself why you constantly answer questions with question, and change definitions to words instead of responding with actual debate.

Gabe answered it for me - posting as performance art.  Well, don't expect any NEA grants unless you start talking about your inner vagina and bathing in your own bodily wastes.

I believe I can fly......urk.
#105 by Bailey
2002-06-20 22:25:15
Whisp

Looking back at the byline, we notice that said author happens to be the founder of Codeplay.

A man above reproach, I'm sure.

I'm making a cyberdifference in an eCommunity populated with iFolk- *HURK* suicide
#106 by Max Diablos
2002-06-20 22:27:42
Why redefine the category of 'games' when this already is contained in the category of Interactive Multimedia?


My main thrust of argument is the popular definition and perception of games is limited. Everything else flows from that. Unless that point can be accepted I can't see any progress being made here...

No helter skelter. No over the rainbow bad trip apocalypse. Just us and this moment now. This is how it ends.
#107 by Ed
2002-06-20 22:28:06
coj@funkatron.com http://www.funkatron.com
If cG lets coders render this guy's head more efficiently, then I'm all for it.

i need assertion devils inside my eye won't let up any motion
i need a surgeon devils inside won't cut me any slack
#108 by Greg
2002-06-20 22:32:24
Did someone beat Emmitt Smith with a baseball bat?

You should do, what should be done, by you.

-Ancient Japanese Proverb
#109 by LPMiller
2002-06-20 22:35:02
lpmiller@gotapex.com http://www.gotapex.com
Dunno...should we?

I believe I can fly......urk.
#110 by Mister Nutty
2002-06-20 22:35:49
more efficiently?  not really.  Even with Cg you're going to burn a bunch of fillrate on the high-res textures required to get that "creepy foot licker" look.

But in the right hands it could enable more advanced per-pixel lighting (now with BaldShine(TM) technology), not to mention hair effects (which would only apply to the facial hair on this guy).

Smashing!
#111 by Max Diablos
2002-06-20 22:39:43
#104 by LPMiller

I did ask myself why you constantly answer questions with question, and change definitions to words instead of responding with actual debate. Gabe answered it for me - posting as performance art.


I mix posting performance art with opinions. I like it. But, there is always a serious point being made. Answering a question with a question isn't something I do very often and is often a useful tool of discussion. I like to chew around with opinions and examine them from different angles. The mistake you're probably making is that you think I'm sucking people in to fool around with them. Performance aside, as I said earlier, always has a serious point behind it. I don't toy with people. I toy with ideas. For me, posting is a muse.

No helter skelter. No over the rainbow bad trip apocalypse. Just us and this moment now. This is how it ends.
#112 by Ergo
2002-06-20 22:45:05
For me, posting is a muse.


See? You're doing it again.

"Conductor Fist says the next stop is your face! Choo! Choo!"
#113 by crash
2002-06-20 22:50:18

For me, posting is a muse.

it's extremely amusing to me, too. so we have that in common.

Whoops, sorry, was my common sense showing again? -HoseWater
#114 by Max Diablos
2002-06-20 22:52:30
#112 by Ergo

Don't be daft. Would it be clearer if I said forums were a muse? Sheesh.

Cambridge International Dictionary of English

an imaginary being or force that gives someone ideas and helps them to write, paint or make music.

Consider also the origination of the word "museum."

No helter skelter. No over the rainbow bad trip apocalypse. Just us and this moment now. This is how it ends.
#115 by Ergo
2002-06-20 23:04:23
Sarcasm is lost on you, my friend.

"Conductor Fist says the next stop is your face! Choo! Choo!"
#116 by Mister Nutty
2002-06-20 23:05:07
Wait, how are you defining sarcasm?  Just what *IS* sarcasm?  crash? Max?

Smashing!
#117 by Bailey
2002-06-20 23:05:35
A muse seems to imply something of artistic worth or value is being created..?

Please stop using my web browser as a toilet.
#118 by Shadarr
2002-06-20 23:07:36
shadarr@yahoo.com http://digital-luddite.com
an imaginary being or force that gives someone ideas and helps them to write


Obviously, it's not working very well for you... unless you grade based stricly on quantity.
#119 by bago
2002-06-20 23:43:01
manga_Rando@hotmail.com
hrm.. posting as performance art...

Trolling for NEA dollars! woot!

And one of the most annoying things is trying to eat fried rice while dodging the vegetables. Those lil sprouts get everywhere!

iamelectro
#120 by curst
2002-06-21 00:14:07
curst@zombieworld.com
#48 - Lessee, I've got 128MB RAM, a GeForce 3, and a 550mhz P3.  Grand Theft Auto 3 runs marvelously, aside from all the virtual memory swapping if I move from one 'island' of the city to another.

My super-sophisticated analysis & conclusion: nVidia 0wnz ATI.  With or without Cg.

ODBhuddist
#121 by Leslie Nassar
2002-06-21 03:00:36
http://departmentofinternets.com
Somebody get a rope and one of those dogs with the rum... Max Diablos has fallen into a sarchasm and can't get out!

i like monkeys.  are you a monkey?
#122 by yotsuya
2002-06-21 05:25:46
My wife buys VHS because, quite frankly, DVDs scare her. I'm the opposite. I only buy DVD, but not if it is not available in a Widescreen format. This is why I don't own The Karate Kid, National Lampoon's Vacation, or Purple Rain on DVD.

I love watching films in the proper aspect ratio, even on my 27 inch TV. It's so wierd, but movies that I have grown up on that I now watch the way they were originally filmed is just so new and exciting to me.

Arizona Diamondbacks 2001 World Series Champions
"It's all about positioning! So assume the position!" JMCDaveL
#123 by Bailey
2002-06-21 06:59:34
This is why I don't own The Karate Kid, National Lampoon's Vacation, or Purple Rain on DVD.

I can think of a few other good reasons not to own those.

Please stop using my web browser as a toilet.
#124 by yotsuya
2002-06-21 08:21:54
Beauty is in the eye of the nostalgic, Bailey.

Arizona Diamondbacks 2001 World Series Champions
"It's all about positioning! So assume the position!" JMCDaveL
#125 by Bailey
2002-06-21 09:49:16
Tell it to Ralph Macchio, kitsch king.

Please stop using my web browser as a toilet.
#126 by crash
2002-06-21 10:22:17
Purple Rain, tho...

...mmmm Apollonia...

Whoops, sorry, was my common sense showing again? -HoseWater
#127 by MCorleone
2002-06-21 15:11:07
I thought Richard Grieco was kitsch king?

Build a man a fire and you'll keep him warm for the rest of the night.  Light a man on fire and you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life.
#128 by yotsuya
2002-06-21 22:38:12
Heh. You said Ralph Macchio.

Seriously, is he in one of those "David Cassedy- Oh my god, playing on that show/in that movie ruined my career because no one takes me seriously?" modes? Yeah. Heay Ralph, check out Tom Hanks, Ron Howard, John Travolta, and Tom Cruise to see how taking your CRAFT seriously by choosing the right roles can negate the "Bosom Buddies" "Richie Cunningham" "Vinnie Barbarino" factor.

Arizona Diamondbacks 2001 World Series Champions
"It's all about positioning! So assume the position!" JMCDaveL
#129 by Mister Nutty
2002-06-21 22:43:26
Ralph Macchio was da bomb in My Cousin Vinny, yo.

Smashing!
#130 by yotsuya
2002-06-21 22:53:00
No, Joe Pesci made THAT film.

I'm curious, because I've seen this a lot (not that this is what you were implying, Bailey). What's wrong with buying movies, books, games, cd, etc. for nostalgia's sake? I've been on other boards where someone says something like, "I bought some GI Joe episodes on DVD today" and people start ripping that person because "That's so 80s" or "Why that? The animation sucks."

So? If I liked it 15 years ago, where is it written that I can't like it now, even if I see all the faults and cheesiness I may not have seen back then? If I liked Barry Gordy's The Last Dragon when I was in the 7th grade, why would buying the DVD make me some kind of creep? Just wonderin'.

Arizona Diamondbacks 2001 World Series Champions
"It's all about positioning! So assume the position!" JMCDaveL
#131 by Funkdrunk
2002-06-21 22:55:01
jflavius@bellatlantic.net
Who is the master?

Funk.
#132 by Mister Nutty
2002-06-21 23:02:51
Sho'nuff.

Smashing!
#133 by Duality
2002-06-21 23:08:08
Dualipuff@yahoo.com http://stratoscape.ath.cx/
If it makes you feel any better yotsuya, I've picked up all 3 volumes (the first season) of Transformers released by Rhino so far.

With a few exceptions where I can't hold my suspension of disbelief, its still really fun to watch.

-Jon
#134 by Xero
2002-06-21 23:46:57
http://novakometa.blogspot.com/
Hey I own that movie on DVD, I actually met Taimak when he lived on the upper west side!

"Every legend, moreover, contains its residuum of truth, and the root function of language is to control the universe by describing it."
-James Baldwin
#135 by Bailey
2002-06-22 00:57:52
I fondly remember The Last Dragon, which is why I'd never watch it again, so many years later. How could it ever live up to my golden childhood memories? That's my approach to nostalgia, in any case. If it's your money, and you wanna spend it, please, stimulate the economy. I'm certainly not going to hold it against you, but if you start rambling about how the lastest DVD of Thundercats kicked Mumm-Ra's ass, I'm certainly going to voice an alternative opinion on the matter.

As for Karate Kid, I thought it was pretty crappy the first time I saw it, hence my original angle of snide commentary.

Please stop using my web browser as a toilet.
#136 by hangedmanAG
2002-06-22 01:17:26
www.livejournal.com/users/hangedman_ag/
I am all in favor of buying DVDs for nostalgia's sake (especially since many are 10-15 bucks) but I can never endorse purchasing The Last Dragon.

With the exception of the Shogun parts, that movie was a giant sack of smelly ass.

there is no emoticon for my spite
#137 by LPMiller
2002-06-22 02:07:49
lpmiller@gotapex.com http://www.gotapex.com
Sho'nuff!


I made the mistake of catching it on HBO...good lord.

I believe I can fly......urk.
#138 by chris
2002-06-22 02:29:38
cwb@shaithis.com http://www.cerebraldebris.com
Goonies and Big Trouble in Little China help up to my nostalgia, particularly the latter, which is actually funnier and better now than it was then.

The last dragon, regrettably, joined the Blade Runner director's cut, and the first DVD release of Seven that you had to flip over mid-movie, on my "watch once, never touch again" list (though I haven't actually thrown it away, the way I did those two).

-chris
#139 by yotsuya
2002-06-22 02:43:23
Heh. You said Thundercats.

I never liked Thundercats. I was a Voltron/GI Joe/Transformers/Robotech man myself.

Speaking of nostalgia, if you liked Tron, get the DVD. Not only does it have fascinating extras, but the colors do not bleed the way they do on VHS. It looks great.

Arizona Diamondbacks 2001 World Series Champions
"It's all about positioning! So assume the position!" JMCDaveL
#140 by Terata
2002-06-22 03:22:25
The Last Dragon is STILL great.  I mean, c'mon, Sho'Nuff be the shogun of Harlem, how do you top that?
#141 by LPMiller
2002-06-22 03:26:16
lpmiller@gotapex.com http://www.gotapex.com
with large caliber weaponry, and a steady aim.

I believe I can fly......urk.
#142 by AnalFissure
2002-06-22 03:36:50
I bought Tron on DVD. A week later they announced the special edition. Hate that.
C O M M E N T S
Home » Topic: Cg: nVidious Plot or Graphical Revolution?

|«« - Previous Page - Next Page - »»|
P O S T   A   C O M M E N T

You need to be logged in to post a comment here. If you don't have an account yet, you can create one here. Registration is free.
C R A P T A G S
Simple formatting: [b]bold[/b], [i]italic[/i], [u]underline[/u]
Web Links: [url=www.mans.de]Cool Site[/url], [url]www.mans.de[/url]
Email Links: [email=some@email.com]Email me[/email], [email]some@email.com[/email]
Simple formatting: Quoted text: [quote]Yadda yadda[/quote]
Front Page (ATOM) • Submission Bin (4) • ArchivesUsersLoginCreate Account
You are currently not logged in.
There are currently 0 people browsing this site. [Details]