PlanetCrap 6.0!
Front Page (ATOM) • Submission Bin (4) • ArchivesUsersLoginCreate Account
You are currently not logged in.
T O P I C
Anarchy Online Best MMORPG of 2001?
February 12th 2002, 22:06 CET by Morn

Believe it or not, but good old Anarchy Online has been awarded Best MMORPG of 2001 by PC Gamer.

Hmm.

Ignoring the crash problems the game had in the first months after its launch, I can honestly say that I've had more fun with AO than I've had with DAoC. Yes, DAoC has been very stable, but it lacks something AO has. Maybe allowing me to be silly? Who knows.

Overall, I think MMORPGs aren't anywhere near where they could, or should be. Everquest, Asheron's Call, Dark Age of Camelot and Anarchy Online are all essentially the same game -- one of the reasons why I'm currently not subscribed to any of them. (The other is the little thing about having to play with other people. Oh, the horror.)

Anyway -- should a game that was shipped in a horrible, horrible state be awarded like this, no matter if it's the most fun? Doesn't that send the wrong message to developers and publishers alike? Discuss, people!
C O M M E N T S
Home » Topic: Anarchy Online Best MMORPG of 2001?

|«« - Previous Page - Next Page - »»|
#47 by "JMCDaveL"
2002-02-13 05:01:54
rdl@muw.edu Closet Freak
Futurama cancellation = Millions of slashdot geeks sobbing = :)

Creole Ned - Read the topic, I think that says plenty for PCLamer's credibility or lack thereof.

--jmc
#48 by "LPMiller"
2002-02-13 05:35:08
lpmiller@gotapex.com http://www.gotapex.com
AO had a lot of nothing. I mean A LOT of nothing.

DAOC has a little of nothing, but that gets better all the time.

AO was a great concept, though it was poorly thought out.  

DAOC has a pretty standard concept, but they do it well.

A game doesn't have to be original so much as it needs to work, and have something to actually do.
#49 by "Post-It"
2002-02-13 05:59:20
NOSPAMkeithlee@speakeasy.net http://www.opencrap.org
You know, I don't really know if I should share this.

Don't click it unless you don't mind Flash, have 2 minutes to watch it, and really really don't mind the fact that it is waaaayyyy wacky & weird, but one of those things you jsut keep watching because you are hypnotized by its complete ebrace of the bizzare.

You have been warned:
Super Mario Twins
#50 by "JMCDaveL"
2002-02-13 07:10:36
rdl@muw.edu Closet Freak
That's ancient history Post-It :P

The song is by a band called Group X and they have some really funny songs, a quick browse with morpheus will turn up pretty much all of them.

Enjoy.
--jmc
~you would give me kiss if i were on soccer team~
#51 by "JMCDaveL"
2002-02-13 07:12:09
rdl@muw.edu Closet Freak
BONUS MYSTERY LINK!
#52 by "Bailey"
2002-02-13 08:03:28
www.ashrain.net
Cute JMC. I guess it would be spoil-sportish of me to mention that's not worksafe.
#53 by "Ashiran"
2002-02-13 09:26:25
ashiran@ashrain.net www.wtfpeople.com
#41 by Creole Ned
So where exactly does PC Gamer sit on the credibility meter, anyway? I haven't read the magazine for quite some time.

I'm not reading mags for credibility. They are all too eager to get that hot new preview or the latest in hot gamedevelopment (which is quite valid). You can tell by the way previews always get more pages then the reviews. However they never bother to do some fact checking for the popular phrases they toss up.

Two examples I can recall at this time.
Example 1:
"Voyager Elite Force has the voices from the orignal cast including the all tight and lusious Seven of Nine!"
Jeri Ryan was the only one of the original cast who DIDN'T lend her voice for the game. Check the credits.

Example 2:
"From the makers of Homeworld Cataclysm: Sigma!" (currently ICreatures)
Relic Studios made the original Homeworld but had almost nothing to do with Cataclysm which was made by Barking Dog Studios.

Minor annoyances indeed and most people wouldn't even notice. It's not that I'm saying they should stop doing this it just shows how credible and "in the scene" mags are. I'm just reading them to see if there is some new game announced I might like. Definitly not for their opinion on games cause that rarely is consistent with my own.
#54 by "flamethrower"
2002-02-13 09:49:52
nopedope thnxbro
PIGs'll come of age when you don't have this fucking d&dlite wank, clogging up the phone system and the player's arteries.

Imagine Deus Ex, on-line, persistent. So much potential for different player factions, random day-to-day persistence - lots of upgrades, skills & devices potential, devloper-made major plot advances for overall story arc.

Now that's what I'm talking about.
#55 by "Morn"
2002-02-13 11:14:28
hendrik@mans.de http://www.mans.de
Oh, and regarding the #planetcrap IRC situation: Desiato, I checked out EGN prior to NewNet, and I didn't like it much. Basically, the Ircop I had to talk to to get #planetcrap registered seemed to be some kind of 15 year old claiming to be some kind of "ISP", but displaying an unhealthy lack of Internet and spelling skills (those two rarely go together well, anyway). :b

I'm kind of disappointed by the frequent net splits on NewNet. Are they hosting one of their hubs on some kind of 56k line?!

That's why I'm going to put an IRC server on PlanetCrap's new server really soon, so everything will be back to normal. I believe Max aka Chromag has been setting something up, too; maybe we'll just use that, or even link the two servers. We'll see.

- Morn
#56 by "Gunp01nt"
2002-02-13 12:39:22
supersimon33@hotmail.com http://planetp01nt.tmfweb.nl
It was in Elvish. Elves are in this year.

Elvish lives.
#57 by "Gunp01nt"
2002-02-13 12:45:54
supersimon33@hotmail.com http://planetp01nt.tmfweb.nl
crash:
Caryn: it's already here, albeit in a limited fashion.

Yep, that's a porn game alright... site opens with 2 pop-ups and has a 'sneak peek tour'!

awesome graphics, man! So it's a retro game!
#58 by "flamethrower"
2002-02-13 14:04:24
nopedope thnxbro
Did this specific story make it here yet?

This is the Microsoft XP licence.

GO TO page 6. Find INTERNET-BASED SERVICE COMPONENTS headline. Read it. You:

"...acknowledge and agree that Microsoft may automatically check the version of the Product and / or It's components that you are utilizing and may provide upgrades or fixes to the product that will be AUTOMATICALLY downloaded to your Workstation Computer".



IBSC, isn't that a bit like, oh I don't know, MAIL, or EXPLORER?

Doesn't this mean MS can thereafter scan your computer at-will and install any software they desire? And they're not required to inform you or anything? Just checking...
#59 by "GizmoChubs"
2002-02-13 14:53:57
gizmo@egizmokid.com
Hello,

I've been viiting this site for quite sometime, but never actually posted anything. Well, I guess its time to say something.

I've played AO and DaOC extensively, and in my opinion, DaOC is considerably better than AO. Now, I am not going to talk about stability here, because thats what we all know, inspite of all the patches etc etc, DaOC is still far more stable than AO.

Now, why is DAOC better than AO? Because, if you visit camelotherald.com often. you will see that Mythic is constantly adding new content in the form of new quests, new monster models, new spells, new sounds, new items and recently they even added a COMPLETE NEW EPIC ZONE. Moreover, according to what the Dev has said at camelotherald, they will continue to add new fresh content into the game at rgeular intervals. Shortly, they will also be adding a lowbie RvR zone and even a completely new PvP server. Improvements like these help keep a game rfresh and community alive. AO on the other hand, is STABLE, I mean.. things just happen.. things keep going on. I just find AO bland compared to DaOC. I mean, with DAOC , there is always something new to look forward to.
#60 by "Gunp01nt"
2002-02-13 14:57:08
supersimon33@hotmail.com http://planetp01nt.tmfweb.nl
flame:
Doesn't this mean MS can thereafter scan your computer at-will and install any software they desire? And they're not required to inform you or anything? Just checking...

Yes. But what else is new? Microsoft = Microsoft.
#61 by "flamethrower"
2002-02-13 15:05:50
nopedope thnxbro
Yes. But what else is new?


Gyroscooters that look like pogosticks.
#62 by "Gunp01nt"
2002-02-13 15:09:02
supersimon33@hotmail.com http://planetp01nt.tmfweb.nl
flamey:
Gyroscooters that look like pogosticks.

Really? wow... first time I've heard of it!
#63 by "Anonymous"
2002-02-13 15:29:24

#40 by Bailey

Too late, Eris. Too late by far.


Noooo... I still have more Warhammer 40k games to go before that happens!
#64 by "flamethrower"
2002-02-13 15:35:58
nopedope thnxbro
Really? wow... first time I've heard of it!


If that was intentionally funny, it was. If you don't know what I'm referring to, move right along.
#65 by "flamethrower"
2002-02-13 16:05:34
nopedope thnxbro
Word to the Irish among us, yur cops are as good as yur soldiers.
#66 by "JMCDaveL"
2002-02-13 16:12:03
rdl@muw.edu Closet Freak
Yes Flamey, it's called Windows Update. You can turn it off. THE HORROR!!!

Sorry Bailey, of course one could argue that one should do work at work :P

--jmc
#67 by "Eris"
2002-02-13 16:12:55
*sigh*. I need to get around to getting my A+ cert. I'm applying to the Dept of Transportation soon, and no matter how useless the cert is (and how much I can pass it with nooooo problems) it still looks good. I just can't justify paying what, 300$ for both tests.
#68 by "Eris"
2002-02-13 16:20:44
Cool. http://www.testvouchers.com/ has them for 25% off, if anyone else is on the low-end of the IT industry.
#69 by "deadlock"
2002-02-13 16:22:37
deadlock@eircom.net
flamethrower:
Word to the Irish among us, yur cops are as good as yur soldiers.

Shouldn't that be 'yur cops are as "good" as our cops. But they're still not as bad as our soldiers' ?

deadlock

bleh
#70 by "Bailey"
2002-02-13 17:01:35
www.ashrain.net
JMC

At this job, I'd go a little nutty without PC at my fingertips. But I was reading it at home, in any case. This shitty PC couldn't handle any page with sound or graphics anyway. Literally, it's an overclocked 486 dx or somesuch dinosaur.
#71 by "Darren Coleman"
2002-02-13 17:50:26
durzel@superficial.net http://www.superficial.net
Morn,

You should move #planetcrap to QuakeNet, the IRC network for today's gaming cognoscenti.  Not that I'm affiliated with it in any way at all mind.  No siree.
#72 by "Battle-Dwarf"
2002-02-13 17:57:56
Great GazooOO0ooO!! Where are you ?
re:  'Lord of the Rings'

I felt the first fifteen minutes of the film were phenominal. The rest of the content was true in the spirit of Tolkien.  However,

It ended just like...that. Strange.






The Male Battle-D
#73 by "Bailey"
2002-02-13 18:20:57
www.ashrain.net
Which is exactly how the first book ended, so it pretty much fit the bill.
#74 by "Battle-Dwarf"
2002-02-13 18:25:11
Great GazooOO0ooO!! Where are you ?
Quote:
[Which is exactly how the first book ended, so it pretty much fit the bill.]

Perhaps.
However, to the casual moviegoer (myself and someone else) the ending was (to put it nicely) 'anti-climatic'.



The Male Battle-D
#75 by "Gunp01nt"
2002-02-13 19:02:43
supersimon33@hotmail.com http://planetp01nt.tmfweb.nl
Battle Dwarf:
However, to the casual moviegoer (myself and someone else) the ending was (to put it nicely) 'anti-climatic'.

Heh, from what I heard the 'casual-moviegoer' didn't even understand a fuckin thing of the movie since the 'casual moviegoer' never read the book...
#76 by "Caryn Law"
2002-02-13 19:04:23
carynlaw@pacbell.net
#75 Gunp01nt

Heh, from what I heard the 'casual-moviegoer' didn't even understand a fuckin thing of the movie since the 'casual moviegoer' never read the book...


I never read the book(s) and I understood the movie just fine.
#77 by "Gunp01nt"
2002-02-13 19:12:12
supersimon33@hotmail.com http://planetp01nt.tmfweb.nl
caryn:
I never read the book(s) and I understood the movie just fine.

Then you're with the smart 5% that didn't read the book but understood the movie the first time they saw it.
#78 by "Bailey"
2002-02-13 19:13:53
www.ashrain.net
Considering there's little to no closure until half-way through the third book, there's not really much the director could do about that without rewriting the whole story. Sucks for the LCD as most didn't seem to understand there's going to be two more movies, but hey, whaddya do?
#79 by "Ergo"
2002-02-13 19:19:45
stuart_harms@mentor.com http://www.opencrap.org
#77 Gunp01nt
caryn:
I never read the book(s) and I understood the movie just fine.

Then you're with the smart 5% that didn't read the book but understood the movie the first time they saw it.


Whatever, man. I saw the movie with six other co-workers who never read the books who had no problems at all, and I'm not sure any of them CAN read. They're not exactly brain trusts.
#80 by "Caryn Law"
2002-02-13 19:22:18
carynlaw@pacbell.net
#79 Ergo
#77 Gunp01nt
caryn:
I never read the book(s) and I understood the movie just fine.

Then you're with the smart 5% that didn't read the book but understood the movie the first time they saw it.


Whatever, man. I saw the movie with six other co-workers who never read the books who had no problems at all, and I'm not sure any of them CAN read. They're not exactly brain trusts.


I know other people too who saw it and understood it, and even loved it. The wife of a friend of mine is totally NOT into fantasy, never read the books, and he said that even she loved the movie and understood what was going on.
#81 by "Bailey"
2002-02-13 19:28:57
www.ashrain.net
Wait a minute... someone who uses a handle involving the term "dwarf" who hasn't read Tolkien? That's just wrong. And probably hypocritical, but I'm not sure how.
#82 by "m0nty"
2002-02-13 19:38:27
m0nty_au@bigpond.com no fixed abode
I'm a bit worried that when the movie was called out at the Awards nominations, it was "Lord of the Rings", when the actual name of the film (and the first book) is The Fellowship of the Ring. Will The Two Towers be known as Lord of the Rings II?

/me shudders...
#83 by "JMCDaveL"
2002-02-13 19:48:41
rdl@muw.edu Closet Freak
I thought the movie ended as well as a the first chapter of a 3 volume set can, they have a major battle, Frodo sets on his journey, blah blah... works out good to me. Reminded me of Empire Strikes Back.
--jmc
#84 by "Ergo"
2002-02-13 19:51:36
stuart_harms@mentor.com http://www.opencrap.org
#83 JMCDaveL
I thought the movie ended as well as a the first chapter of a 3 volume set can, they have a major battle, Frodo sets on his journey, blah blah... works out good to me. Reminded me of Empire Strikes Back.
--jmc


Agreed. It cracks me up when people say "But it ended so abruptly!"
#85 by "Leslie Nassar"
2002-02-13 20:04:51
http://senator.you.are.no.johncarmack.com/
Yeah, those people are crazy!  Sure, the film went on and on about how the ring must be destroyed, then stopped before the task is complete without any explanation... but that's not abrupt, that's masterful storytelling!
#86 by "Bailey"
2002-02-13 20:08:59
www.ashrain.net
Hrm... wonder if I put a copy of The Two Towers on e-bay as a "finely bound, early working edition of the second LoTR script", would it sell?
#87 by "Post-It"
2002-02-13 20:13:33
- -
Bailey
Hrm... wonder if I put a copy of The Two Towers on e-bay as a "finely bound, early working edition of the second LoTR script", would it sell?


Like Hot & Fresh Krispy Kreme sex rings.
#88 by "Morn"
2002-02-13 20:13:34
hendrik@mans.de http://www.mans.de
Max kindly set up a new IRC server on his machine, irc.chromag.net. irc.planetcrap.com has been CNAME'd to it, so you can use that to connect, too. The channel is still #planetcrap. Enjoy. And thanks, Max. =)

- Morn
#89 by "Sgt Hulka"
2002-02-13 20:22:17
sgt_hulka@yahoo.com http://www.hulka.com
#86 Bailey
Hrm... wonder if I put a copy of The Two Towers on e-bay as a "finely bound, early working edition of the second LoTR script", would it sell?


Yes it would.

........I always give 110% +12
#90 by "Ergo"
2002-02-13 20:26:23
stuart_harms@mentor.com http://www.opencrap.org
#85 Leslie Nassar
Yeah, those people are crazy!  Sure, the film went on and on about how the ring must be destroyed, then stopped before the task is complete without any explanation... but that's not abrupt, that's masterful storytelling!


Excellent point! We should tell Jackson that since most people are dense, he should call the next movie Episode II so he doesn't confuse them!
#91 by "Bailey"
2002-02-13 20:35:13
www.ashrain.net
Hulka

Yes it would.

That's sad, but for... scientific study... I'm going to try it tonight anyway.
#92 by "deadlock"
2002-02-13 20:41:16
Leslie Nassar:
Yeah, those people are crazy! Sure, the film went on and on about how the ring must be destroyed, then stopped before the task is complete without any explanation... but that's not abrupt, that's masterful storytelling!

My sister went to it with her boyfriend last weekend and they were both bemused by the ending. She was like 'it was great until the end - when the film finished and they hadn't even destroyed the ring, it was just fucking pointless'. When I pointed out that it was the first part of a trilogy and there was probably five more hours of film to go before we see the ring actually destroyed, it dawned on her that there was a reson that it's called 'Lord of the Rings - Fellowship of the Ring'.

deadlock
#93 by "Bailey"
2002-02-13 20:51:49
www.ashrain.net
Just to get a little something off my chest here:

Fucking techs.

Nothing personal against any of those of you here who fall under the terminology, but the jackasses I bought my PC off of in July have forgotten all the assurances and promises they gave me at the time regarding upgrade-friendliness... i.e. discounting ram or processors if I brought the system back to them and ordered the parts through them. Now they tell me I "should be able to sell the old parts secondhand without much trouble".

I should've gotten it in writing, in retrospect, but the situation regarding the forming of their business (splitting off from an older company and leaving all the sleazy business types behind, in order to form a purely geek-run operation) I took them at their word as it all seemed so very earnest.

Sigh. I can't believe in anything anymore. Don't even get me started on the Santa Claus fiasco from last week.
#94 by "Sgt Hulka"
2002-02-13 21:00:44
sgt_hulka@yahoo.com http://www.hulka.com
#93 Bailey
Just to get a little something off my chest here:

Fucking techs.
Sigh. I can't believe in anything anymore. Don't even get me started on the Santa Claus fiasco from last week.


Don't feel alone Baileytron, I fell for the same scam a few years ago.  GET IT IN WRITING is the best advice.  In my experiences in life, most people will fuck you over for a buck.  Sad, but true.

........I always give 110% +12
#95 by "None-1a"
2002-02-13 21:05:44
http://www.opencrap.org
#94 Sgt Hulka
Don't feel alone Baileytron, I fell for the same scam a few years ago.  GET IT IN WRITING is the best advice.  In my experiences in life, most people will fuck you over for a buck.  Sad, but true.


And while your getting it in writing make sure it doesn't say "we have the right to revise this upgrade policy at any time" any where in it.
#96 by "Bailey"
2002-02-13 21:12:55
www.ashrain.net
So, can anyone recomment a good napalm solution? I'm thinking 2 parts gasoline to 1 part detergent, but it's been a good while since I was this much a dissatisfied customer, so I might be a bit off...
C O M M E N T S
Home » Topic: Anarchy Online Best MMORPG of 2001?

|«« - Previous Page - Next Page - »»|
P O S T   A   C O M M E N T

You need to be logged in to post a comment here. If you don't have an account yet, you can create one here. Registration is free.
C R A P T A G S
Simple formatting: [b]bold[/b], [i]italic[/i], [u]underline[/u]
Web Links: [url=www.mans.de]Cool Site[/url], [url]www.mans.de[/url]
Email Links: [email=some@email.com]Email me[/email], [email]some@email.com[/email]
Simple formatting: Quoted text: [quote]Yadda yadda[/quote]
Front Page (ATOM) • Submission Bin (4) • ArchivesUsersLoginCreate Account
You are currently not logged in.
There are currently 0 people browsing this site. [Details]