PlanetCrap 6.0!
Front Page (ATOM) • Submission Bin (1) • ArchivesUsersLoginCreate Account
You are currently not logged in.
T O P I C
So is Planetcrap dead then?
April 8th 2008, 02:18 CEST by Chunkstyle

In #planetcrap the question came up of whether the site is finally dead.  Post counts are down to the level of when the Crap started, the number of posters is way down (especially when you include Joker alts), and the level of discussion has dropped as well.

So is that it?  Have the multitude of other gaming sites and forums removed the need for the crappiest place on the web?  Will the last one to leave forever please turn off the server?
C O M M E N T S
Home » Topic: So is Planetcrap dead then?

|«« - Previous Page - Next Page - »»|
#77 by CheesyPoof
2008-04-08 19:29:14
I can get behind that, but do you feel similarly weird when talking about pirated TV shows and movies? At least 360 games aren't readily pirated.

<Hugin_len> Basically, cheesy doesn't have awful taste in music, he's simply very white.
#78 by Hugin
2008-04-08 19:30:06
lmccain@nber.org
Cheesy, movies, yes.  TV shows, no.

"Bioshock, sadly, is no Painkiller." - BobJustBob
#79 by LPMiller
2008-04-08 19:32:07
lpmiller@gotapex.com http://www.gotapex.com
I don't know why piracy would affect a conversation on whether a game is a good game or not. On it's bugginess, sure, but....

Plus, there is not a forum you would go to where there weren't at least a fair amount of pirates, but most of them might not SAY they are pirates because they wouldn't want the shunning. Here, you can be honest in your thievery, which might be more honest, actually.

Having said that, I bought witcher the other day and like it, even if all the sex really is stupid.

"Testiculos habet et bene pendentes" - "He has testicles, and they dangle nicely."
#80 by CheesyPoof
2008-04-08 19:33:29
Well, as far as I can tell he PC warez crowd is Dum, anaguens, and assembler (maybe format). Movie pirates include gaggle and I'm sure other people, but I'm forgetting who.

I dunno, but listing it out like that I don't know if they cover "most folks." Maybe most folks that only play PC games, though.

<Hugin_len> Basically, cheesy doesn't have awful taste in music, he's simply very white.
#81 by G-Man
2008-04-08 19:35:31
Re: topics
I don't really see the lack of topics as being so much a problem personally, but m0nty is right that we are too lazy to write decent topics, and he is also right that one answer is to just copy the digg model for topic generation. The solution could be as simple as making another greasemonkey plugin which works the way the digg bookmarklets work, but instead would automagically generate a topic from the linked article.
#82 by Caryn
2008-04-08 19:41:22
carynlaw@pacbell.net http://www.hellchick.net
Maybe I am indeed confusing submission bin lag with lack of topics, since Gabe does in fact push them.

I haven't written a topic in a while, but in the interests of experimentation and helping out the site, I'll see if I can write some in the near future that are relevant and interesting. In fact, I may have one that I can write up at lunch today.

Bellydance!
#83 by Jibble
2008-04-08 19:42:16
IRC isn't getting shut down. That's crazy talk.

What if I give you a delicious sandwich? What say you to that?

I joke a lot about the death of the site, but short of a mass suicide, it's not going anywhere. People go into hibernation and the site ebbs and ebbs, but the tub will never really empty all the way because we're too stubborn to turn the tap all the way off. We'll even go so far as to start up another topic about the death of the site.

Lady, people aren't chocolates. But you know what they are, mostly? Bastards. Bastard-coated bastards with bastard filling.

Blog. 194 lbs.  14 to go.
#84 by CheesyPoof
2008-04-08 19:43:56
It always seems that discussing its death brings a short term boost at least.

<Hugin_len> Basically, cheesy doesn't have awful taste in music, he's simply very white.
#85 by Chunkstyle
2008-04-08 19:51:20
chunkstyle46@yahoo.com
The lack of topics doesn't bother me that much, as it keeps the Christmas topic on the first page, which helps prevent ghosts.

Game Developers: Don't forget the zombie monkeys.
#86 by Jamie
2008-04-08 19:51:37
jamie@jmadigan.net http://www.jmadigan.net
The main problem I have with PC and the reason I don't post/read more is that you all feed the trolls too much. It often pushes the signal/noise ratio into intolerable levels, and paired with the broken topic system makes the site a boring chore to read because the trolling spreads all over the current topics. If there were more topics, the trolling might be more localized and I could just move on to a new topic and let the old one die. Yes, there are good parts, but I hate wading through waist-high troll dung to get to them.

#87 by Jibble
2008-04-08 19:54:05
So, in order to fix PlanetCrap:

• Ignore feature for both trolls and posts that quote trolls
• Fix topic submission
• Enable images

Excellent.

Lady, people aren't chocolates. But you know what they are, mostly? Bastards. Bastard-coated bastards with bastard filling.

Blog. 194 lbs.  14 to go.
#88 by Jamie
2008-04-08 19:56:55
jamie@jmadigan.net http://www.jmadigan.net
Enable images? That's crazy. You're crazy. Stop being crazy.

#89 by Gabe
2008-04-08 19:59:52
http://www.mandog.com
I know I harp on it, but stop bitching about the "broken topic system" and fucking write some topics. Unless your definition of "broken topic system" is "topics don't get written". In that case, carry on.
#90 by Jibble
2008-04-08 20:11:27
Jesus, this broken topic system is going to be the death of this place.

Lady, people aren't chocolates. But you know what they are, mostly? Bastards. Bastard-coated bastards with bastard filling.

Blog. 194 lbs.  14 to go.
#91 by anaqer
2008-04-08 20:11:52
Let's face it: PC is no longer relevant. No topic gets linked on any news site, game developers no longer post here (or not about work, anyway) - it's just a small,  ever-dwindling bunch of people writing a sort of community blog with the occasional insult and/or discussion thrown in. We need more people, end of story.

#10 - Why not both come out of a window?
#92 by Caryn
2008-04-08 20:13:43
carynlaw@pacbell.net http://www.hellchick.net
I know I harp on it, but stop bitching about the "broken topic system" and fucking write some topics. Unless your definition of "broken topic system" is "topics don't get written". In that case, carry on.

I just said I'd help by writing some! Get off my back! YOU'RE NOT MY REAL DAD!

Bellydance!
#93 by yotsuya
2008-04-08 20:15:50
I also vouch for the '"n00bs" get flamed and don't come back' thing as being overrated. Look at TreeFrog. We didn't run him off.
#94 by Matt Perkins
2008-04-08 20:16:09
wizardque@yahoo.com http://whatwouldmattdo.com/
Gabe (#89):
I know I harp on it, but stop bitching about the "broken topic system" and fucking write some topics. Unless your definition of "broken topic system" is "topics don't get written". In that case, carry on.

Gabe...we've had this discussion before. You pushing topics that work for you isn't a working submission bin. As a matter of fact, that's a plan for more of the same. I don't write topics here because why am I looking to get you to push a topic, to validate its existence? I can just to qt3 or my site and post a topic without having to go through the Does Gabe Like It™ process.

As a matter of fact, I think 5-10 of the regulars, and more/less as needed, should be given the ability to push topics. Even if I'm not a part of that group, that would go a LONG way to providing new and interesting shit to talk about.


For instance, had I the ability to get stuff on the front page in a timely manner, I would have posted a writeup about Stardock and GPG going to together and Stardock's Impulse. I'm very excited by both of those prospects. Sure, I could have done and put it in the bin and told you and hope you decided it was worth the push, but why do I want to do that when again, I can just do it on my site or go to qt3 and do it there (or in this case, talk about it there in the already created thread)?

"Thug means never having to say you're sorry." - UTurn
#95 by CheesyPoof
2008-04-08 20:19:04
The main problem I have with PC and the reason I don't post/read more is that you all feed the trolls too much.

What constitutes a troll is different to everyone. There are few trolls only here and everyone else has some balance of content to troll/snark. The troll that must not be named, lest you get blamed by funk, hasn't been around for over a month now (thanks Gabe!).

<Hugin_len> Basically, cheesy doesn't have awful taste in music, he's simply very white.
#96 by Ergo
2008-04-08 20:21:19
Gabe doesn't "push topics that work for him." He pushes pretty much anything except for marketing spam and moronic shit from trolls like Joker or Ng Yo.

Invention is the Green Goblin of Necessary Lemonade.

--Flowers
#97 by Jibble
2008-04-08 20:21:27
I was joking. Matt, seriously, stop it. Gabe will push almost anything through, he's not approving anything, he's trying to help keep the site fresh.

Lady, people aren't chocolates. But you know what they are, mostly? Bastards. Bastard-coated bastards with bastard filling.

Blog. 194 lbs.  14 to go.
#98 by CheesyPoof
2008-04-08 20:21:37
WTF Perkins? Gabe doesn't pass any judgement on any topic other than the obvious spam and trolls (e.g. Ng Yo and the troll that must not be named, lest you be scolded by funk).

<Hugin_len> Basically, cheesy doesn't have awful taste in music, he's simply very white.
#99 by CheesyPoof
2008-04-08 20:22:08
Oh, screw you, Ergo.

<Hugin_len> Basically, cheesy doesn't have awful taste in music, he's simply very white.
#100 by yotsuya
2008-04-08 20:32:16
Cheesy's right. Obviously, Caroline was a troll, but some people might think Gaggle and his complaining about pirated HD video not being in 7.1 is a troll, or FoRMaT and whatever he's talking about as being a troll.
#101 by Caryn
2008-04-08 20:41:12
carynlaw@pacbell.net http://www.hellchick.net
Matt, you had one topic that Gabe chose not to push through. Out of all the topics that have been posted, that's the only topic that wasn't a deliberate troll that I can remember him choosing not to push. You choosing not to post new topics because of that one experience is being kind of silly when I'm sure you'd come up with quite a few he'd push.

Bellydance!
#102 by Chunkstyle
2008-04-08 20:45:35
chunkstyle46@yahoo.com
Who cares if PC is "relevant" or not?

Game Developers: Don't forget the zombie monkeys.
#103 by Caryn
2008-04-08 20:46:12
carynlaw@pacbell.net http://www.hellchick.net
Having said that, I can see the argument that you don't have to wait for your topic to be posted when you do it at qt3, so you have instant gratification there. But that's one of the good things about this site -- there's a shit filter. It's rarely needed except for the occasional troll submission, but it forces a standard of quality on the topics for discussion, and I like that.

Bellydance!
#104 by Fugazi(werking)
2008-04-08 20:46:31
jcawthorn@evercorp.com
I don't think I have ever submitted a topic here-I AM PART OF THE PROBLEM!

#105 by Jibble
2008-04-08 20:49:58
I should submit a topic about how cute my baby is compared to all of yours. If Gabe doesn't push it, I will accuse him of personally choking the site to death with his bare hands.

Lady, people aren't chocolates. But you know what they are, mostly? Bastards. Bastard-coated bastards with bastard filling.

Blog. 194 lbs.  14 to go.
#106 by Caryn
2008-04-08 20:50:16
carynlaw@pacbell.net http://www.hellchick.net
Also, Matt, in your post you say that you'd like to see a couple of other people empowered to approve topics, but then you go and say that you won't submit a topic here because you don't want to have to go through the "do the moderators like it" filter and one of your topics was rejected before. So really, the problem isn't the amount of people approving topics -- Gabe is a query away for that and very responsive -- the problem is that once one of the approvers rejects your topic you don't want to write any more, and so we're back to the issue of there not being enough topics. Though most people shouldn't take one rejection so seriously.

Bellydance!
#107 by Squeaky
2008-04-08 20:51:24
There have been a couple of times when I've thought up a topic to write. Then I reconsider and post a condensed version in 290. I'm part of the problem!

#108 by CheesyPoof
2008-04-08 20:52:23
I don't ever remember Gabe killing a Perkin's topic.

<Hugin_len> Basically, cheesy doesn't have awful taste in music, he's simply very white.
#109 by Jibble
2008-04-08 20:53:45
I think what Matt is trying to say is that he would like to be granted authority to push his own topics through.

Lady, people aren't chocolates. But you know what they are, mostly? Bastards. Bastard-coated bastards with bastard filling.

Blog. 194 lbs.  14 to go.
#110 by Ergo
2008-04-08 20:54:37
He's the new m0nty.

Invention is the Green Goblin of Necessary Lemonade.

--Flowers
#111 by Gabe
2008-04-08 20:55:26
http://www.mandog.com
Basically what I do is push, ignore, or delete. Things I've ignored have gotten voted in or out eventually. I remember not forcing a m0nty topic, but not a Matthew one. It's certainly possible I didn't push one of his. I certainly didn't DELETE them.

It amuses me that they both rail against the despotism because at some point in the past the despotism wasn't on their side for an instant push.
#112 by Shadarr
2008-04-08 20:58:10
shadarr@gmail.com http://digital-luddite.com
I find I don't talk about games on the Crap as much as I might, specifically PC games, because it feels, rightly or wrongly, like a lot of the folks here who still game right now pirate everything.

I think part of the problem is that we're older and slower.  I still play games about 4.5 days a week (proof!) but I very rarely get games at release.  I think the reason qt3 has such energetic game talk is that there are a lot of day-one campers there, and they all play the same games at the same time.

There's a bit of that here, but I think a lot of us are playing games that have been out for months or years and so if we talk about the games we're playing, it's a different dynamic.  Other people may have played the game but it lacks the shared experience of a bunch of people playing the same thing at the same time.  I know that when I played Assassin's Creed, part of what made it cool was just getting to be involved in the release-time discussion.

Oh, and I haven't pirated a game since Space Rangers 2, except for DOA XBV, but that's because I refuse to pay for porn.

Witnesses in the house heard Jones say "why did you pee on me Pooh Bear?" A few moments later, the witness heard the son say "Mama you done stabbed me."
#113 by Matt Perkins
2008-04-08 21:03:12
wizardque@yahoo.com http://whatwouldmattdo.com/
Wow, way to read things in to what I say.

I do think it's seriously silly to have one guy's bent deciding the submission bin. I didn't take it personally when Gabe didn't push my topic. I'm not on his cool guy list and that's cool. I did learn not to submit topics...I just post in an existing topic like I do now. I can't even remember what the topic was, probably because it wasn't a big deal.

Heck, those of you are on his list or know what Gabe likes, do submit interesting, timely topics. I am by no means saying I'm the savior of this site or need to be able to push my topics through. Only that we need more topics and more discussion points. I think that's best expressed by multiple people having say in it. And I'd say that if it was Gabe, me, or someone else being the only person deciding content on the site. I could obviously be wrong.


/me goes back to petting his now long forgotten topic and setting up his incredibly spectacular revenge plans!

"Thug means never having to say you're sorry." - UTurn
#114 by Matt Perkins
2008-04-08 21:04:23
wizardque@yahoo.com http://whatwouldmattdo.com/
Gabe (#111):
It amuses me that they both rail against the despotism because at some point in the past the despotism wasn't on their side for an instant push.

It amuses me that people assume this is the reason I suggest more than one voice have say on the content shown on the front page. *shrugs*

"Thug means never having to say you're sorry." - UTurn
#115 by Shadarr
2008-04-08 21:06:34
shadarr@gmail.com http://digital-luddite.com
I also vouch for the '"n00bs" get flamed and don't come back' thing as being overrated. Look at TreeFrog. We didn't run him off.

I've always maintained that there is no initiation process.  There's just the constant snark and flaming that we're all imune to and noobs aren't.  They either toughen up or they quit.  But there's no "alright, you passed your hazing, now we'll all be civil" like some kind of frat-house debate club.  Really, if you don't enjoy getting called a dickhead sucker fool, this is not the site for you.


the troll that must not be named, lest you be scolded by funk

Starting a new meme, are we?

Witnesses in the house heard Jones say "why did you pee on me Pooh Bear?" A few moments later, the witness heard the son say "Mama you done stabbed me."
#116 by CheesyPoof
2008-04-08 21:08:09
I sure am trying!

<Hugin_len> Basically, cheesy doesn't have awful taste in music, he's simply very white.
#117 by Chunkstyle
2008-04-08 21:08:16
chunkstyle46@yahoo.com
Funk is probably Joker.

Game Developers: Don't forget the zombie monkeys.
#118 by Caryn
2008-04-08 21:08:30
carynlaw@pacbell.net http://www.hellchick.net
I didn't take it personally when Gabe didn't push my topic. I'm not on his cool guy list and that's cool.

That's...pretty much the definition of taking it personally.

Bellydance!
#119 by Gabe
2008-04-08 21:08:50
http://www.mandog.com
Cool guy list? I have almost no interaction with Jibble other than to tell him his kid is boring and he had the impression I push almost everything. What topics am I not pushing that should have been? I've only ever deleted spam or obvious trolls, so if it's not in the submission bin or live, it was voted out.
#120 by Chunkstyle
2008-04-08 21:08:54
chunkstyle46@yahoo.com
But Joker with a well-shaved head, due to some product I don't remember.

Game Developers: Don't forget the zombie monkeys.
#121 by Shadarr
2008-04-08 21:11:45
shadarr@gmail.com http://digital-luddite.com
I'd be in favour of giving 10 or so people the power to push topics, though perhaps not their own.  But not Matt because he's illiterate.  The only reason to not just automatically post everything to the frong page is spam and crap from the troll who must not be named lest you be scolded by funk.  I think it would improve things a lot of people were able to write topics, then post a single "somebody push my topic, you fucks" rather than having to wait for all the fucks to vote, during which time we all mock the topic in the thread where it was announced and by the time it hits the front page we're all bored with it, even though we haven't really discussed it.

Witnesses in the house heard Jones say "why did you pee on me Pooh Bear?" A few moments later, the witness heard the son say "Mama you done stabbed me."
#122 by Ergo
2008-04-08 21:11:55
I love it when Perkins goes into martyr-mode. Poor 'lil fella.

Invention is the Green Goblin of Necessary Lemonade.

--Flowers
#123 by G-Man
2008-04-08 21:15:36
Caryn said in #106:
it forces a standard of quality on the topics for discussion, and I like that.

Are you high? It doesn't enforce a standard of quality, it reduces quality to the lowest possible level. Most of the topics here are of the "XXX fucks you up the ass" or "keeping it all in one place" variety. Which is fine by me because I don't think I really want to visit yet another forum that has meaningful topics with small, but focused discussion centering on those topics. Or at least, the transition would be hard to get used to after having experienced PC in its broken state for so long.
#124 by Gabe
2008-04-08 21:21:08
http://www.mandog.com
it reduces quality to the lowest possible level

Really?
#125 by Caryn
2008-04-08 21:21:30
carynlaw@pacbell.net http://www.hellchick.net
It's a standard of quality that's a step above a system that would allow any topic to be immediately posted (which would flood PC with the troll submissions that get deleted or ignored currently). The standard of quality just happens to be limited in scope right now to what types of submissions we're getting. If we had some Andy Smith-type submissions we might see the criteria for acceptance and rejection rise in standards. But when you're choosing between the troll submissions and "sports to keep it all in one place"...eh, the standard of quality is still being enforced even if the bar is low.

Bellydance!
#126 by FoRmaT
2008-04-08 21:26:32
You're worse than friggan gunp0int. What car did buy and what are you fixing, etc.

I bought a BMW 325i Touring with what I thought was a burnt head gasket.

But the fault is with the cylinder head itself, which seems to be cracked (apparently a widespread issue on E30 BMWs). I couldn't find a used cylinder head that I trusted, so I went and bought a whole car that was pretty cheap, so I was buying an engine I'd seen running.

I'm taking out its head plus the tail lights, because the car I want to keep has tail lights that have been entirely coated red, which in Germany is asking for trouble, plus I might keep the original headlights as well because the car I bought first has a pair of those so-called Angel Eyes, and I don't know how durable those are. The rest will have to go, which really is a shame because the body is very sound and has less rust than the one I'm planning to keep. I could just keep the one I bought for spares but the interior is pretty trashed, the rear diff makes banging noises, and the engine seems to have a little less pull than the one from the other car (which is chipped, dunno how much of a difference that can be, never had a chipped naturally-aspirated car) and it smokes black under heavy acceleration.

So it's either: keep car with some rust, just repair and change cylinder head, or keep car with less rust, but change differential, engine block, repair cylinder and change cyl. head, change seats, change roof lining... And the second option is too much hassle for me only to have a car with a little less rust.

"Action stars of two decades ago shot .44 bullets out of their cocks. Honestly, if me and Charles Bronson were in the same room I'd kill myself just to make sure he didn't hurt me."
C O M M E N T S
Home » Topic: So is Planetcrap dead then?

|«« - Previous Page - Next Page - »»|
P O S T   A   C O M M E N T

You need to be logged in to post a comment here. If you don't have an account yet, you can create one here. Registration is free.
C R A P T A G S
Simple formatting: [b]bold[/b], [i]italic[/i], [u]underline[/u]
Web Links: [url=www.mans.de]Cool Site[/url], [url]www.mans.de[/url]
Email Links: [email=some@email.com]Email me[/email], [email]some@email.com[/email]
Simple formatting: Quoted text: [quote]Yadda yadda[/quote]
Front Page (ATOM) • Submission Bin (1) • ArchivesUsersLoginCreate Account
You are currently not logged in.
There are currently 79 people browsing this site. [Details]